ArticleJACC. Asia2024
Heart Rate Fragmentation, Ambulatory Blood Pressure, and Coronary Artery Calcification: A Population-Based Study.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Severe Obesity, Hypertension, and Physical Activity with 24 h Heart Rate Variability in Adults.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Heart rate dynamics in polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome: from heterogeneity to wearable digital phenotyping.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Vagal impairment and cardiovascular risk in those with zero to low coronary artery calcification scores: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known regarding whether ultra-rapid patterns of heart rate variability (eg, heart rate fragmentation [HRF]) are associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC) in a general population. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the association between HRF and CAC, and whether these associations are independent of systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels. Methods: From SESSA (the Shiga Epidemiological Study of Subclinical Atherosclerosis), we used data from 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to identify awake and asleep SBP levels, and data from concurrent 24-hour Holter monitoring to quantify HRF using the awake and asleep percentage of inflection points (PIP). CAC on computed tomography scanning was quantified using an Agatston score. We used multivariable binomial logistic regression to assess the associations of PIP and ambulatory SBP with the presence of CAC, as defined by Agatston score >0. Results: Of the 508 participants in this study (mean age: 66.5 ± 7.3 years), 325 (64%) had CAC and 183 (36%) did not. In fully adjusted models of prevalent CAC that also included office SBP, the ORs with 95% CIs for awake PIP, awake SBP, asleep PIP, and asleep SBP were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.99-1.54), 1.40 (95% CI: 1.11-1.77), 1.31 (95% CI: 1.05-1.62), and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.02-1.60), respectively. There was no evidence of interaction between PIP and ambulatory SBP in association with CAC. Results were similar when other HRF indices instead of PIP were used. Conclusions: Higher HRF and SBP levels during sleep are each associated with the presence of CAC in a general male population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.