Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463629›Full record

ArticleJournal of marriage and the family2015

Looking Forward in Candidate Gene Research: Concerns and Suggestions.

Gabriel L Schlomer, H H Cleveland, David J Vandenbergh, Gregory M Fosco, Mark E Feinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of marriage and the family, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Romantic Partner Alcohol Misuse Interacts withJournal of contemporary criminal justice · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriel L SchlomerDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies and Department of Biobehavioral Health, 308 Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
H H ClevelandDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, 310 Health and Human Development East, University Park, PA 16802.
David J VandenberghDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, Neuroscience Program, and Genetics Program, The Pennsylvania State University, 303 Chandlee Laboratory, University Park, PA, 16802.
Gregory M FoscoDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, 310 Health and Human Development East, University Park, PA 16802.
Mark E FeinbergPrevention Research Center, 316 Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.

Funding

Implications of Genetic Variance for Substance Use Interventions in AdolescenceR01DA030389 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CLEVELAND, HOBART HARRINGTON, VANDENBERGH, DAVID J · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidate Gene × Environment (cGxE) interaction research holds promise for helping us understand for whom and why environments matter for families and development. In their commentary on our target article (G. L. Schlomer, G. M. Fosco, H. H. Cleveland, D. J. Vandenbergh, & M. E. Feinberg, 2015), J. E. Salvatore and D. M. Dick (2015) present their view of the current state and future of cGxE research and frame the debate regarding its merits for advancing knowledge of gene-environment interplay. In this reply, we discuss points of agreement and departure and provide a list of 5 domains by which the quality of cGxE research should be evaluated. Our hope is that researchers will use this list as a guide for their own work.

Indexed as

candidate geneGxEsociobiologysusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID38463629
PMCPMC10923596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.