Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463618›Full record

ReviewCrystal growth & design2024

Strategies to Improve Electrical Conductivity in Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Comparative Study.

Rajat Saha, Kajal Gupta, Carlos J Gómez García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Crystal growth & design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metal-Organic Framework-Based Supercapacitors: A Comprehensive Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. MIL-101-DIST/g-CScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Non-Aqueous Electrochemical COSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajat SahaDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjasot, Valencia, Spain.
Kajal GuptaDepartment of Chemistry, Nistarini College, Purulia, 723101, WB India.
Carlos J Gómez GarcíaDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjasot, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-577X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), formed by the combination of both inorganic and organic components, have attracted special attention for their tunable porous structures, chemical and functional diversities, and enormous applications in gas storage, catalysis, sensing, etc. Recently, electronic applications of MOFs like electrocatalysis, supercapacitors, batteries, electrochemical sensing, etc., have become a major research topic in MOF chemistry. However, the low electrical conductivity of most MOFs represents a major handicap in the development of these emerging applications. To overcome these limitations, different strategies have been developed to enhance electrical conductivity of MOFs for their implementation in electronic devices. In this review, we outline all these strategies employed to increase the electronic conduction in both intrinsically (framework-modulated) and extrinsically (guests-modulated) conducting MOFs.

Identifiers

PMID38463618
PMCPMC10921413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.