Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463539›Full record

ArticleIEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine workshops. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2023

Diurnal Pain Classification in Critically Ill Patients using Machine Learning on Accelerometry and Analgesic Data.

Jessica Sena, Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay, Mohammad Tahsin Mostafiz, Andrea Davidson, Ziyuan Guan, Jesimon Barreto, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Patrick Tighe, Azra Bihorac, William Robson Schwartz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine workshops. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica SenaFederal University of Minas Gerais/Department of Computer Science, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Sabyasachi BandyopadhyayUniversity of Florida/J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, USA.
Mohammad Tahsin MostafizUniversity of Florida/J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, USA.
Andrea DavidsonUniversity of Florida/Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Ziyuan GuanUniversity of Florida/Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jesimon BarretoFederal University of Minas Gerais/Department of Computer Science, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Tezcan Ozrazgat-BaslantiUniversity of Florida/Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Patrick TigheUniversity of Florida/Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Azra BihoracUniversity of Florida/Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
William Robson SchwartzFederal University of Minas Gerais/Department of Computer Science, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Parisa RashidiUniversity of Florida/J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, USA.

Funding

Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
(MEnD-AKI) Multicenter Implementation of an Electronic Decision Support System for Drug-associated AKIR01DK121730 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, KANE-GILL, SANDRA L · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
ADAPT: Autonomous Delirium Monitoring and Adaptive PreventionR01NS120924 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Intelligent Intensive Care Unit (I2CU): Pervasive Sensing and Artificial Intelligence for Augmented Clinical Decision-makingR01EB029699 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
The circadian clock protein BMAL and post-translational regulation of ENaC in the kidneyR01DK123078 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ALLI, ABDEL AYUBE · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Development and Validation of Computational Algorithms to Assess Kidney Health in Electronic Health RecordsK01DK120784 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI OZRAZGAT BASLANTI, TEZCAN · 2020 to 2023
$580k
Autonomous Pain Recognition in Non-Verbal and Critically Ill PatientsR21EB027344 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RASHIDI, PARISA · 2019 to 2022
$577k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029699NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB027344NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK120784NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121730NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123078NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying pain in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is challenging due to the increased prevalence of communication barriers in this patient population. Previous research has posited a positive correlation between pain and physical activity in critically ill patients. In this study, we advance this hypothesis by building machine learning classifiers to examine the ability of accelerometer data collected from daily wearables to predict self-reported pain levels experienced by patients in the ICU. We trained multiple Machine Learning (ML) models, including Logistic Regression, CatBoost, and XG-Boost, on statistical features extracted from the accelerometer data combined with previous pain measurements and patient demographics. Following previous studies that showed a change in pain sensitivity in ICU patients at night, we performed the task of pain classification separately for daytime and nighttime pain reports. In the pain versus no-pain classification setting, logistic regression gave the best classifier in daytime (AUC: 0.72, F1-score: 0.72), and CatBoost gave the best classifier at nighttime (AUC: 0.82, F1-score: 0.82). Performance of logistic regression dropped to 0.61 AUC, 0.62 F1-score (mild vs. moderate pain, nighttime), and CatBoost's performance was similarly affected with 0.61 AUC, 0.60 F1-score (moderate vs. severe pain, daytime). The inclusion of analgesic information benefited the classification between moderate and severe pain. SHAP analysis was conducted to find the most significant features in each setting. It assigned the highest importance to accelerometer-related features on all evaluated settings but also showed the contribution of the other features such as age and medications in specific contexts. In conclusion, accelerometer data combined with patient demographics and previous pain measurements can be used to screen painful from painless episodes in the ICU and can be combined with analgesic information to provide moderate classification between painful episodes of different severities.

Indexed as

AccelerometerActigraphCatBoostICUIntensive Care UnitMachine LearningShimmer

Identifiers

PMID38463539
PMCPMC10923604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.