Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463498›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Transfer Learning Bayesian Optimization to Design Competitor DNA Molecules for Use in Diagnostic Assays.

Ruby Sedgwick, John P Goertz, Molly M Stevens, Ruth Misener, Mark van der Wilk

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruby SedgwickDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London.
John P GoertzDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London.
Molly M StevensDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London.
Ruth MisenerDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London.
Mark van der WilkDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London.

Funding

A SERS nanoneedle system for studying Staphylococcus aureus survival in live cellsF32GM131594 · NIGMS · IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE · PI GOERTZ, JOHN · 2019 to 2021
$178k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM131594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise in engineered biomolecular devices, there is an increased need for tailor-made biological sequences. Often, many similar biological sequences need to be made for a specific application meaning numerous, sometimes prohibitively expensive, lab experiments are necessary for their optimization. This paper presents a transfer learning design of experiments workflow to make this development feasible. By combining a transfer learning surrogate model with Bayesian optimization, we show how the total number of experiments can be reduced by sharing information between optimization tasks. We demonstrate the reduction in the number of experiments using data from the development of DNA competitors for use in an amplification-based diagnostic assay. We use cross-validation to compare the predictive accuracy of different transfer learning models, and then compare the performance of the models for both single objective and penalized optimization tasks.

Identifiers

PMID38463498
PMCPMC10925383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.