Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463497›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

A new method of modeling the multi-stage decision-making process of CRT using machine learning with uncertainty quantification.

Kristoffer Larsen, Chen Zhao, Joyce Keyak, Qiuying Sha, Diana Paez, Xinwei Zhang, Guang-Uei Hung, Jiangang Zou, Amalia Peix, Weihua Zhou

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kristoffer LarsenDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Chen ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA, USA.
Joyce KeyakDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Qiuying ShaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Diana PaezNuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Xinwei ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Guang-Uei HungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Jiangang ZouDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Amalia PeixNuclear Medicine Department, Institute of Cardiology, La Habana, Cuba.
Weihua ZhouDepartment of Applied Computing, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.

Funding

Multi-modality Image Fusion to Improve Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery DiseaseR15HL172198 · NHLBI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, WEIHUA · 2024 to 2024
$427k
NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL172198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Current machine learning-based (ML) models usually attempt to utilize all available patient data to predict patient outcomes while ignoring the associated cost and time for data acquisition. The purpose of this study is to create a multi-stage machine learning model to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response for heart failure (HF) patients. This model exploits uncertainty quantification to recommend additional collection of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) variables if baseline clinical variables and features from electrocardiogram (ECG) are not sufficient. Methods: 218 patients who underwent rest-gated SPECT MPI were enrolled in this study. CRT response was defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 5% at a 6±1 month follow-up. A multi-stage ML model was created by combining two ensemble models: Ensemble 1 was trained with clinical variables and ECG; Ensemble 2 included Ensemble 1 plus SPECT MPI features. Uncertainty quantification from Ensemble 1 allowed for multi-stage decision-making to determine if the acquisition of SPECT data for a patient is necessary. The performance of the multi-stage model was compared with that of Ensemble models 1 and 2. Results: The response rate for CRT was 55.5% (n = 121) with overall male gender 61.0% (n = 133), an average age of 62.0±11.8, and LVEF of 27.7±11.0. The multi-stage model performed similarly to Ensemble 2 (which utilized the additional SPECT data) with AUC of 0.75 vs. 0.77, accuracy of 0.71 vs. 0.69, sensitivity of 0.70 vs. 0.72, and specificity 0.72 vs. 0.65, respectively. However, the multi-stage model only required SPECT MPI data for 52.7% of the patients across all folds. Conclusions: By using rule-based logic stemming from uncertainty quantification, the multi-stage model was able to reduce the need for additional SPECT MPI data acquisition without sacrificing performance.

Indexed as

CRTmachine learningmulti-stageSPECT MPIuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID38463497
PMCPMC10925379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.