Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463435›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2024

Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Learning Model for Forecasting and Diagnosis of Glaucoma Disease.

Yeganeh Madadi, Hashem Abu-Serhan, Siamak Yousefi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reply.Ophthalmology science · 2026
    Article
  4. JustRAIGS: Justified Referral in AI Glaucoma Screening Challenge.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. ChatGPT Assisting Diagnosis of Neuro-Ophthalmology Diseases Based on Case Reports.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yeganeh MadadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Hashem Abu-SerhanHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QA.
Siamak YousefiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USHamad Medical Corporation · QA

Funding

Predicting the risk of glaucoma from structural, functional, and genetic factors using artificial intelligenceR01EY033005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Improved Glaucoma Monitoring Using Artificial-Intelligence Enabled DashboardR21EY031725 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2020 to 2022
$545k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033005NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main factor causing irreversible blindness is glaucoma. Early detection greatly reduces the risk of further vision loss. To address this problem, we developed a domain adaptation-based deep learning model called Glaucoma Domain Adaptation (GDA) based on 66,742 fundus photographs collected from 3272 eyes of 1636 subjects. GDA learns domain-invariant and domain-specific representations to extract both general and specific features. We also developed a progressive weighting mechanism to accurately transfer the source domain knowledge while mitigating the transfer of negative knowledge from the source to the target domain. We employed low-rank coding for aligning the source and target distributions. We trained GDA based on three different scenarios including eyes annotated as glaucoma due to 1) optic disc abnormalities regardless of visual field abnormalities, 2) optic disc or visual field abnormalities except ones that are glaucoma due to both optic disc and visual field abnormalities at the same time, and 3) visual field abnormalities regardless of optic disc abnormalities We then evaluate the generalizability of GDA based on two independent datasets. The AUCs of GDA in forecasting glaucoma based on the first, second, and third scenarios were 0.90, 0.88, and 0.80 and the Accuracies were 0.82, 0.78, and 0.72, respectively. The AUCs of GDA in diagnosing glaucoma based on the first, second, and third scenarios were 0.98, 0.96, and 0.93 and the Accuracies were 0.93, 0.91, and 0.88, respectively. The proposed GDA model achieved high performance and generalizability for forecasting and diagnosis of glaucoma disease from fundus photographs. GDA may augment glaucoma research and clinical practice in identifying patients with glaucoma and forecasting those who may develop glaucoma thus preventing future vision loss.

Indexed as

deep learningdiagnosisDomain adaptationforecastingglaucomalow-rank representation

Identifiers

PMID38463435
PMCPMC10922017
OpenAlexW4391831282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.