Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463423›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Data sources and applied methods for paclitaxel safety signal discernment.

Laura Elisabeth Gressler, Erika Avila-Tang, Jialin Mao, Alejandra Avalos-Pacheco, Fadia T Shaya, Yelizaveta Torosyan, Alexander Liebeskind, Madris Kinard, Christina D Mack, Sharon-Lise Normand and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura Elisabeth GresslerOffice for Clinical Evidence and Analysis, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Erika Avila-TangOffice for Clinical Evidence and Analysis, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Jialin MaoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Alejandra Avalos-PachecoApplied Statistics Research Unit, Faculty of Mathematics and Geoinformation, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Fadia T ShayaSchool of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Yelizaveta TorosyanOffice for Clinical Evidence and Analysis, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Alexander LiebeskindOffice for Clinical Evidence and Analysis, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Madris KinardDevice Events, York, PA, United States.
Christina D MackIQVIA Real World Solutions, Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Sharon-Lise NormandDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Mary E RitcheyMed Tech Epi, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Danica Marinac-DabicOffice for Clinical Evidence and Analysis, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Following the identification of a late mortality signal, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened an advisory panel that concluded that additional clinical study data are needed to comprehensively evaluate the late mortality signal observed with the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES). The objective of this review is to (1) identify and summarize the existing clinical and cohort studies assessing paclitaxel-coated DCBs and DESs, (2) describe and determine the quality of the available data sources for the evaluation of these devices, and (3) present methodologies that can be leveraged for proper signal discernment within available data sources. Methods: Studies and data sources were identified through comprehensive searches. original research studies, clinical trials, comparative studies, multicenter studies, and observational cohort studies written in the English language and published from January 2007 to November 2021, with a follow-up longer than 36 months, were included in the review. Data quality of available data sources identified was assessed in three groupings. Moreover, accepted data-driven methodologies that may help circumvent the limitations of the extracted studies and data sources were extracted and described. Results: There were 39 studies and data sources identified. This included 19 randomized clinical trials, nine single-arm studies, eight registries, three administrative claims, and electronic health records. Methodologies focusing on the use of existing premarket clinical data, the incorporation of all contributed patient time, the use of aggregated data, approaches for individual-level data, machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches, Bayesian approaches, and the combination of various datasets were summarized. Conclusion: Despite the multitude of available studies over the course of eleven years following the first clinical trial, the FDA-convened advisory panel found them insufficient for comprehensively assessing the late-mortality signal. High-quality data sources with the capabilities of employing advanced statistical methodologies are needed to detect potential safety signals in a timely manner and allow regulatory bodies to act quickly when a safety signal is detected.

Indexed as

balloonsdata qualitylatemortalitypaclitaxel-coated devicessignal discernmentstents

Identifiers

PMID38463423
PMCPMC10920218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.