Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463421›Full record

ArticleNeurotrauma reports2024

A Perspective on Electrical Stimulation and Sympathetic Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

Tina Tian, Amy M Moore, Paul A Ghareeb, Nicholas M Boulis, Patricia J Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina TianMedical Scientist Training Program, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Amy M MooreDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Paul A GhareebDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nicholas M BoulisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Patricia J WardNeuroscience Graduate Program, Laney Graduate School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) are common and devastating. The current standard of care relies on the slow and inefficient process of nerve regeneration after surgical intervention. Electrical stimulation (ES) has been shown to both experimentally and clinically result in improved regeneration and functional recovery after PNI for motor and sensory neurons; however, its effects on sympathetic regeneration have never been studied. Sympathetic neurons are responsible for a myriad of homeostatic processes that include, but are not limited to, blood pressure, immune response, sweating, and the structural integrity of the neuromuscular junction. Almost one quarter of the axons in the sciatic nerve are from sympathetic neurons, and their importance in bodily homeostasis and the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain should not be underestimated. Therefore, as ES continues to make its way into patient care, it is not only important to understand its impact on all neuron subtypes, but also to ensure that potential adverse effects are minimized. This piece gives an overview of the effects of ES in animals models and in humans while offering a perspective on the potential effects of ES on sympathetic axon regeneration.

Indexed as

axonal injuryaxonal regenerationneuroexcitationperipheral nerve injuryregeneration

Identifiers

PMID38463421
PMCPMC10924057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.