Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463378›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions in elderly patients.

Wen-Si Xu, Hui-Yu Zhang, Shuang Jin, Qi Zhang, Hong-Dan Liu, Ming-Tao Wang, Bo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wen-Si XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Hui-Yu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China. 32397208@qq.com.
Shuang JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Hong-Dan LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Ming-Tao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161099, Heilongjiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith advancements in the development of endoscopic technologies, the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been one of the gold-standard therapies for early gastric cancer.

aimTo investigate the efficacy and safety ESD in the treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions in the elderly patients.

methodsSeventy-eight elderly patients with early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University were selected and classified into two groups according to the different surgical therapies they received between January 2021 and June 2022. Among them, 39 patients treated with ESD were included in an experimental group, and 39 patients treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were included in a control group. We compared the basic intraoperative conditions, postoperative short-term recovery, long-term recovery effects and functional status of gastric mucosa between the two groups; the basic intraoperative conditions included lesion resection, intraoperative bleeding and operation time; the postoperative short-term recovery assessment indexes were length of hospital stay and incidence of surgical complications; and the long-term recovery assessment indexes were the recurrence rate at 1 year postoperatively and the survival situation at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively; and we compared the preoperative and predischarge serum pepsinogen I (PG I) and PG II levels and PG I/PG II ratio in the two groups before surgery and discharge.

resultsThe curative resection rate and the rate of

conclusionCompared with EMR, ESD surgery is more thorough. It reduces the rate of base residual focus, recurrence rate, surgical complications, and promotes the recovery of gastric cells and glandular function. It is safe and suitable for clinical application.

Indexed as

Early gastric cancerElderlyEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionSerum pepsinogen

Identifiers

PMID38463378
PMCPMC10921217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.