Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463364›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Biopsy forceps are useful for measuring esophageal varices

Zhi-Hui Duan, Sheng-Yun Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhi-Hui DuanEndoscopy Center, Xingtai People's Hospital, Xingtai 054000, Hebei Province, China. 15131988129@163.com.
Sheng-Yun ZhouEndoscopy Center, Xingtai People's Hospital, Xingtai 054000, Hebei Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo avoid acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, current guidelines recommend screening for high-risk esophageal varices (EVs) by determining variceal size and identifying red wale markings. However, visual measurements of EV during routine endoscopy are often inaccurate.

aimTo determine whether biopsy forceps (BF) could be used as a reference to improve the accuracy of binary classification of variceal size.

methodsAn

resultsThe respondents included 48 academic and four private endoscopists. The accuracy of EV size estimation was low in both the visual (13.81%) and BF-based (20.28%) groups. The use of open forceps improved the ability of the endoscopists to correctly classify the varices by size (small ≤ 5 mm, large > 5 mm) from 71.85% to 82.17% (

conclusionBF may improve the accuracy of EV size assessment, and its use in clinical practice should be investigated.

Indexed as

AccuracyEndoscopyEsophageal varicesLiver cirrhosisMeasurement

Identifiers

PMID38463364
PMCPMC10921203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.