Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463314›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Synthetic Biology: Key Architectures, Applications, and Challenges.

Manoj Kumar Goshisht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. GSF-DTA: An Innovative Graph-Sequence Fusion Framework for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Manoj Kumar GoshishtDepartment of Chemistry, Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54311-7001, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-5388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML), particularly deep learning (DL), has made rapid and substantial progress in synthetic biology in recent years. Biotechnological applications of biosystems, including pathways, enzymes, and whole cells, are being probed frequently with time. The intricacy and interconnectedness of biosystems make it challenging to design them with the desired properties. ML and DL have a synergy with synthetic biology. Synthetic biology can be employed to produce large data sets for training models (for instance, by utilizing DNA synthesis), and ML/DL models can be employed to inform design (for example, by generating new parts or advising unrivaled experiments to perform). This potential has recently been brought to light by research at the intersection of engineering biology and ML/DL through achievements like the design of novel biological components, best experimental design, automated analysis of microscopy data, protein structure prediction, and biomolecular implementations of ANNs (Artificial Neural Networks). I have divided this review into three sections. In the first section, I describe predictive potential and basics of ML along with myriad applications in synthetic biology, especially in engineering cells, activity of proteins, and metabolic pathways. In the second section, I describe fundamental DL architectures and their applications in synthetic biology. Finally, I describe different challenges causing hurdles in the progress of ML/DL and synthetic biology along with their solutions.

Identifiers

PMID38463314
PMCPMC10918679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.