Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463197›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024

Added value of a connected glucose meter for glycorrhachia assessment.

Laurent Blairon, Marie Tré-Hardy, Sophie Collignon, François Coenen, Ingrid Beukinga, Roberto Cupaiolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurent BlaironDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie Tré-HardyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie CollignonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
François CoenenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Ingrid BeukingaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Roberto CupaioloDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the performance and added value of rapid glucose determination in cerebrospinal fluid using a connected glucometer. Design and Methods: Intra-assay and inter-assay accuracies were calculated using residual clinical samples. Accuracies were measured by comparing the results obtained with the glucometer to those from the central laboratory on a large routine chemistry platform. Results: The intra-assay coefficients of variation were between 6.1% and 6.2% for low values (18 mg/dL) and between 5.6% and 6.8% for high values (58 mg/dL). The inter-assay coefficients of variation were between 9.4% and 16.3% for the low values (18 mg/dL) and between 5.7% and 8.7% for the high values (pool; ±75 mg/dL). The regression equation by comparison to the central laboratory was y = 4.08 + 0.82 x, with a coefficient of determination (r Conclusions: The measurement of glycorrhachia with a connected glucometer before the analysis in the central laboratory allows a rapid orientation in the deferential diagnosis of a meningitis of viral vs bacterial origin. The response time is fast (6 s) and requires only a small amount of fluid (1.2 μL), which is important in infants, especially since lumbar puncture is an integral part of the investigation of the origin of a fever in this population.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal fluidConnected blood glucose monitoring systemGlycorrhachiaPoint-of-care

Identifiers

PMID38463197
PMCPMC10924199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.