Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463136›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine insights. Case reports2024

Successful Treatment of Erosive Lichen Planus With Tofacitinib: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Parvin Mansouri, Mohammad Amin Jafari, Reza Chalangari, Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Azadeh Goodarzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine insights. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Atypical Orogenital Lichen Planus in a Young Male: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Use of JAK Inhibitors in Lichen Planus: An Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. History, clinical presentation, therapy, and patient reported outcomes of mucosal lichen planus: a cross-sectional study.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
  11. Vulvar lichen planus a retrospective analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parvin MansouriDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin JafariDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Reza ChalangariSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Masoumeh RoohaninasabDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh GoodarziDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-4429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lichen planus (LP) is an inflammatory disease that affects the skin, hair, nails and mucous membranes. Erosive LP is a chronic and difficult-to-treat subtype of lichen planus, characterized by lesions on mucosal surfaces, particularly in the oral and genital areas. The prevalence of erosive LP has not been determined. To date, treatment has consisted of surgical intervention, photodynamic therapy, laser therapy, and systemic or topical drugs, including steroids and immunomodulatory agents. LP usually need longer periods of treatment and are known as precancerous lesions with a 0.4% to 12% conversion rate. In addition, nearly 25% of patients who develop erosive LP of the vulva are resistant to topical corticosteroids, which are the first choice of treatment. This study reports 6 cases with a mean age of 3.33 years, who were diagnosed with erosive LP lesions and previously failed in treatment with local, intralesional, and systemic steroids, and hydroxychloroquine. These patients were then treated with 10 mg of tofacitinib per day. Interestingly, with the new treatment, the patients' mean overall satisfaction score was 9.16 out of 10 (range: 8-10), the mean pain relief score was 9.16 out of 10 (range: 9-10) and patients' symptom improvement also began an average of 1.33 months after starting treatment (range: 1-2.5 months).

Indexed as

erosive lichen planusJAK inhibitorsLichen planusOLPoral lichen planustofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID38463136
PMCPMC10924541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.