ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following vaccination: analysis of the VAERS database and systematic review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intracranial hemorrhage in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database and systematically review the literature to provide a comprehensive analysis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) secondary to vaccination. Methods: The authors analyzed the VAERS database and conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria for VAERS data were a score of ≥3 on the RCVS Results: Our combined data set included 29 cases (9 RCVS and 20 PRES). Most cases were women (72.4%) with a mean age of 50.7 years (SD 19.4 years). Most cases were associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (58.6% Moderna, 20.7% Pfizer). Hypertension (37.9%), hyperlipidemia (13.7%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (10.3%), and end-stage renal disease (6.8%) were common comorbidities. Furthermore, 20.6% (6/29) of cases were on immunosuppression therapy for various reasons. The mean time to symptom onset was 10.49 days after vaccination (SD 18.60), and the mean duration of hospitalization was 7.42 days (SD 5.94). The symptoms reported the most frequently were headache (41.3%), elevated blood pressure (31.0%), and emesis (17.2%). Typical radiographic findings included T2/FLAIR hyperintensities affecting the parieto-occipital lobes, indicative of vasogenic and/or cytotoxic edema. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of postvaccine RCVS and PRES. Both disease states were seen most often in those with pre-existing risk factors such as female sex, age over 50, hypertension, renal disease, and immunosuppression. Vaccines and their associated immune response may cause endothelial dysfunction leading to cerebral vasospasm and loss of cerebral autoregulation. However, further research is required to understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Despite the associations found, the absolute risk of these syndromes remains extremely low compared to the immense benefits of vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.