ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Synchronized cardioversion resolving refractory supraventricular tachycardia in a neonate: a case report with comprehensive analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Neonatal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) poses unique challenges in diagnosis and management, with refractory cases requiring synchronized cardioversion being exceptionally rare. This case report explores the presentation and management of refractory SVT in a neonate, emphasizing the significance of sharing such clinical scenarios. Case presentation: A 16-day-old neonate, born via emergency caesarean section, presented with respiratory distress, poor feeding, and vomiting. Initial diagnosis of SVT was made on the basis of electrocardiography (ECG) changes. Initial attempts with adenosine failed, leading to the recurrence of tachycardia. Despite amiodarone administration, the tachycardia persisted, prompting synchronized cardioversion. Post-cardioversion, the neonate was managed with oral medications, showing sustained improvement. Clinical discussion: This case report highlights a neonate with refractory SVT, requiring synchronized cardioversion, presenting a rare and challenging scenario. The report addresses diagnostic challenges, treatment approaches, and potential mechanisms for refractory SVT, such as delayed presentation and resistance to adenosine. Emphasizing individualized care plans and vigilant monitoring, this report is a valuable resource for healthcare professionals, contributing to neonatal cardiology understanding and emphasizing the importance of early recognition and effective interventions. Ongoing follow-up and successful outcomes underscore the need for sustained management strategies. Conclusion: This case report sheds light on the rarity of refractory SVT in neonates, emphasizing the complexities in diagnosis and management. Successful synchronized cardioversion and subsequent oral therapy highlight the need for a multifaceted approach in neonatal SVT cases. The implications for clinical practice underscore the importance of awareness and continued research in neonatal cardiology and emergency medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.