Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463050›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-centre's one decade of experience.

Ridho Ardhi Syaiful, Yarman Mazni, Natan Kevin Partogu Siagian, Agi Satria Putranto, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Nur Rahadiani, Febiansyah Ibrahim, Lam Sihardo, Vania Myralda Giamour Marbun, Arnetta Naomi Louise Lalisang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. EREG-secreting THBS1Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Long-term outcomes of thermal ablationWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ridho Ardhi SyaifulDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Yarman MazniDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Natan Kevin Partogu SiagianFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Agi Satria PutrantoDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Wifanto Saditya JeoDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Nur RahadianiDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.
Febiansyah IbrahimDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Lam SihardoDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Vania Myralda Giamour MarbunDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Arnetta Naomi Louise LalisangDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.
Toar Jean Maurice LalisangDigestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Liver cancer is the third leading cause of global cancer deaths, and hepatocellular carcinoma is its most common type. Liver resection is one of the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore our hospital's more than a decade of experience in liver resection for HCC patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study on HCC patients undergoing resection from 2010 to 2021 in a tertiary-level hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. Mortality rates were explored as the primary outcome of this study. Statistical analysis was done on possible predictive factors using Pearson's χ Results: Ninety-one patients were included in this study. The authors found that the postoperative mortality rates were 8.8% (in hospital), 11.5% (30 days), and 24.1% (90 days). Excluding postoperative mortalities, the long-term mortality rates were 44.4% (first year), 58.7% (3 years), and 69.7% (5 years). Cumulatively, the mortality rates were 46.4% (1 year), 68.9% (3 years), 77.8% (5 years), and 67.0% (all time). Significant predictive factors for cumulative 1-year mortality include large tumour diameter [odds ratio (OR) 14.06; 95% CI: 2.59-76.35; comparing <3 cm and >10 cm tumours; Conclusion: The mortality rate of HCC patients undergoing resection is still very high. Significant predictive factors for mortality found in this study benefit from earlier diagnosis and treatment; thus, highlighting the importance of HCC surveillance programs.

Indexed as

carcinomahepatectomyhepatocellularliver neoplasmsmortalityprognostic

Identifiers

PMID38463050
PMCPMC10923277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.