Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463049›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Primary hepatic angiosarcoma: a systematic review.

Santiago Rojas, Carlos Eduardo Rey Chaves, Sofía Robledo, Danny Conde, Juan Carlos Sabogal Olarte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Vascular neoplasms of the liver].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Primary hepatic angiosarcoma mistaken for a giant hemangioma.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Santiago RojasEstudiante de posgrado Cirugía General.
Carlos Eduardo Rey ChavesEstudiante de posgrado Cirugía General.
Sofía RobledoEstudiante de pregrado, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Medicina.
Danny CondeCirugia Hepatobiliar y pancreática, Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi, Universidad el Rosario.
Juan Carlos Sabogal OlarteCirugía Hepatobiliar y páncreatica, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare type of tumour. In adults, the diagnosis remains challenging as the clinical manifestations are generally nonspecific and are usually made too late when complications or metastases are already present, associated with a poor prognosis. Due to the lack of agreement regarding the optimal treatment approach, a comprehensive analysis of the evidence in the literature on the surgical and survival outcomes in terms of disease-free survival time (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients treated for primary hepatic angiosarcoma is needed. Study design: A systematic review of articles published in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Scopus, from 2000 to 2023 with the search terms hepatic angiosarcoma and liver resection or hepatectomy. Pooled individual data concerning the prognosis following various therapies was analyzed. Results: A total of 15 articles involving 886 patients were eligible for inclusion. The male population represents 66.2% ( Conclusion: Primary liver angiosarcoma remains a surgical challenge with a poor prognosis even with complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy. Surgical management shows increased overall survival in comparison with non-surgical management. Early diagnosis could change the natural history of the disease. The literature available is scarce, and further studies are required to create standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Indexed as

liver angiosarcomaliver tumouroutcomessurgerytreatment

Identifiers

PMID38463049
PMCPMC10923304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.