ArticlePNAS nexus2024
Genetic dissection of mutagenic repair and T-DNA capture at CRISPR-induced DNA breaks in
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Versatile Applications of CRISPR-Based Programmable T-DNA Integration in Plants.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Arabidopsis thaliana FANCONI ANAEMIA I (FANCI) has roles in the repair of interstrand crosslinks and CRISPR-Cas9 induced DNA double strand breaks.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Manipulating alternative end-joining alters carbon-ion beam-induced genome mutation profiles in Arabidopsis thaliana.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025Article
- Division of labor within polymerase theta in repair of CRISPR-induced DNA breaks inPNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Context effects on repair of 5'-overhang DNA double-strand breaks induced by Cas12a in Arabidopsis.Plant direct · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A practical and powerful approach for genome editing in plants is delivery of CRISPR reagents via
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.