Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463033›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Experiences in the use of multiple doses of convalescent plasma in critically ill patients with COVID-19: An early phase 1 descriptive study.

Ricardo Aguilar, Sandra López-Vergès, Anarellys Quintana, Johanna Morris, Lineth Lopez, Ana Cooke, Dimas Quiel, Natalie Buitron, Yaseikiry Pérez, Lesbia Lobo and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Ricardo AguilarComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Sandra López-VergèsGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-8479
Anarellys QuintanaComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Johanna MorrisComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Lineth LopezComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Ana CookeComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Dimas QuielComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Natalie BuitronHospital Punta Pacífica Pacífica Salud Panama Panama.
Yaseikiry PérezComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Lesbia LoboComplejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Arnulfo Arias Madrid Caja de Seguro Social Panama Panama.
Maura BallesterosHospital Santo Tomas Panama Panama.
Yaneth PittiGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.
Yamilka DiazGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.
Lisseth SaenzGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.
Danilo FrancoGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.
Daniel CastilloGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.
Elimelec ValdespinoGorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies Panama Panama.
Isabel BlancoCentro de Investigación Médica Pacífica Salud Panama Panama.
Emilio RomeroUniversidad de Panamá Panama Panama.
Alcibiades VillarrealSistema Nacional de Investigación SNI, SENACYT Panama Panama.
Idalina Cubilla-BatistaSistema Nacional de Investigación SNI, SENACYT Panama Panama.ORCID 0000-0003-2269-1730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: At the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, transfusion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy to help patients severely afflicted by COVID-19. The efficacy of CCP has been controversial as it depends on many variables pertaining to the plasma donor and the patient with COVID-19, for example, time of convalescence or symptoms onset. This feasibility and descriptive study aimed to assess the safety of multiple doses of CCP in mechanically ventilated, intubated patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Methods: A cohort of 30 patients all experiencing severe respiratory failure and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit, received up to five doses of 300-600 mL of CCP on alternate days (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8) until extubation, futility, or death. Results: Nineteen patients received five doses, seven received four, and four received two or three doses. At 28-day follow-up mark, 57% of patients recovered and were sent home, and the long-term mortality rate was 27%. Ten severe adverse events reported in the study were unrelated to CCP transfusion. Independent of the number of transfused doses, most patients had detectable levels of total and neutralizing antibodies in plasma. Conclusion: This study suggests that transfusion of multiple doses of CCP is safe. This strategy may represent a viable option for future studies, given the potential benefit of CCP transfusions during the early stages of infection in unvaccinated populations and in settings where monoclonal antibodies or antivirals are contraindicated or unavailable.

Indexed as

convalescent plasmaCOVID‐19critically illneutralizing antibodiesSARS‐CoV‐2

Identifiers

PMID38463033
PMCPMC10920941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.