Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38462759›Full record

ReviewCell proliferation2024

Physical modulation of mesenchymal stem cell exosomes: A new perspective for regenerative medicine.

Dan Wu, Xiansheng Zhao, Jiaheng Xie, Ruoyue Yuan, Yue Li, Quyang Yang, Xiujun Cheng, Changyue Wu, Jinyan Wu, Ningwen Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell proliferation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Molecular imaging of stem cell therapies in ischemic stroke.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Exosomal Gene Biomarkers in Osteosarcoma: Mifepristone as a Targeted Therapeutic Revealed by Multi-Omics Analysis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Electrical Stimulation Therapy - Dedicated to the Perfect Plastic Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan WuDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiansheng ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaheng XieDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ruoyue YuanDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Quyang YangDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiujun ChengDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changyue WuDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinyan WuDepartment of Dermatology, Chongzhou People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Ningwen ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4224-4188

Funding

National Key Research and Development Plan Young Scientists Program 2021YFA1102100National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFA1101100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002042National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (MSC-Exo) offer promising therapeutic potential for various refractory diseases, presenting a novel therapeutic strategy. However, their clinical application encounters several obstacles, including low natural secretion, uncontrolled biological functions and inherent heterogeneity. On the one hand, physical stimuli can mimic the microenvironment dynamics where MSC-Exo reside. These factors influence not only their secretion but also, significantly, their biological efficacy. Moreover, physical factors can also serve as techniques for engineering exosomes. Therefore, the realm of physical factors assumes a crucial role in modifying MSC-Exo, ultimately facilitating their clinical translation. This review focuses on the research progress in applying physical factors to MSC-Exo, encompassing ultrasound, electrical stimulation, light irradiation, intrinsic physical properties, ionizing radiation, magnetic field, mechanical forces and temperature. We also discuss the current status and potential of physical stimuli-affected MSC-Exo in clinical applications. Furthermore, we address the limitations of recent studies in this field. Based on this, this review provides novel insights to advance the refinement of MSC-Exo as a therapeutic approach in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

ExosomesMesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38462759
PMCPMC11294442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.