ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Fusion Imaging Objectively Demonstrates Improved Pancreas Visualization through Manipulation Techniques: A Prospective Interventional Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Water intake pancreatic ultrasonography improves pancreatic body and tail visualization: contributing factors revealed by quantitative analysis.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma originating from focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy demonstrated by transabdominal ultrasonography.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Abdominal ultrasonography (AUS) is used to screen for abdominal diseases owing to its low cost, safety, and accessibility. However, the detection rate of pancreatic disease using AUS is unsatisfactory. We evaluated the visualization area of the pancreas and the efficacy of manipulation techniques for AUS with fusion imaging. Methods Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume data were obtained from 20 healthy volunteers in supine and right lateral positions. The MRI volume data were transferred to an ultrasound machine equipped with a fusion imaging software program. We evaluated the visualization area of the pancreas before and after postural changes using AUS with fusion imaging and assessed the liquid-filled stomach method using 500 ml of de-aerated water in 10 randomly selected volunteers. Patients This study included 20 healthy volunteers (19 men and 1 woman) with a mean age of 33.0 (21-37.5) years old. Results Fusion imaging revealed that the visualization area of the entire pancreas using AUS was 55%, which significantly improved to 75% with a postural change and 90% when using the liquid-filled stomach method (p=0.043). Gastrointestinal gas is the main obstacle for visualization of the pancreas. Conclusion Fusion imaging objectively demonstrated that manipulation techniques can improve pancreatic visualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.