Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461433›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: nomogram based on clinical factors and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics signatures.

Di Zhang, Xian-Ya Zhang, Wen-Wu Lu, Jin-Tang Liao, Chao-Xue Zhang, Qi Tang, Xin-Wu Cui

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Di ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.
Xian-Ya ZhangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue No. 1095, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Wen-Wu LuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.
Jin-Tang LiaoDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound, Xiang Ya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410000, Hunan, China.
Chao-Xue Zhang *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China. zcxay@163.com.
Qi Tang *Department of Ultrasonography, The First Hospital of Changsha, No. 311 Yingpan Road, Changsha, 410005, Hunan, China. 2507176731@qq.com.
Xin-Wu Cui *Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue No. 1095, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. cuixinwu@live.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3890-6660

Funding

High-end Foreign Experts Introduction Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology G2022154032L
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) clinic-radiomics nomogram for individualized assessment of Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsA retrospective cohort comprising 310 HCC individuals who underwent preoperative CEUS (using SonoVue) at three different centers was partitioned into a training set, a validation set, and an external test set. Radiomics signatures indicating the phenotypes of the Ki-67 were extracted from multiphase CEUS images. The radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated accordingly after feature selection and the radiomics model was constructed. A clinic-radiomics nomogram was established utilizing multiphase CEUS Rad-score and clinical risk factors. A clinical model only incorporated clinical factors was also developed for comparison. Regarding clinical utility, calibration, and discrimination, the predictive efficiency of the clinic-radiomics nomogram was evaluated.

resultsSeven radiomics signatures from multiphase CEUS images were selected to calculate the Rad-score. The clinic-radiomics nomogram, comprising the Rad-score and clinical risk factors, indicated a good calibration and demonstrated a better discriminatory capacity compared to the clinical model (AUCs: 0.870 vs 0.797, 0.872 vs 0.755, 0.856 vs 0.749 in the training, validation, and external test set, respectively) and the radiomics model (AUCs: 0.870 vs 0.752, 0.872 vs 0.733, 0.856 vs 0.729 in the training, validation, and external test set, respectively). Furthermore, both the clinical impact curve and the decision curve analysis displayed good clinical application of the nomogram.

conclusionThe clinic-radiomics nomogram constructed from multiphase CEUS images and clinical risk parameters can distinguish Ki-67 expression in HCC patients and offer useful insights to guide subsequent personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaKi-67 AntigenLiver NeoplasmsNomogramsUltrasonographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaKi-67 AntigenContrast-enhanced ultrasoundHepatocellular carcinomaKi-67NomogramRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.