Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461318›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

Genome-matched treatments and patient outcomes in the Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative (MCGI).

Eric C Anderson, John DiPalazzo, F Lee Lucas, Michael J Hall, Andrey Antov, Petra Helbig, Jennifer Bourne, Leah Graham, Lory Gaitor, Christine Lu-Emerson and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Translating evidence into practice: Developing Canada's first position statement on genomics-informed oncology nursing.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  4. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Eric C AndersonCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-6308
John DiPalazzoCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, USA.
F Lee LucasCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, USA.
Michael J HallFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrey AntovThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME, USA.
Petra HelbigThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME, USA.
Jennifer BourneThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME, USA.
Leah GrahamThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME, USA.
Lory GaitorThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME, USA.
Christine Lu-EmersonMaineHealth Cancer Care, South Portland, ME, USA.
Leslie S BradfordMaine Medical Partners Women's Health, Gynecologic Oncology, Scarborough, ME, USA.
Roger InhornPenBay Medical Center Oncology, Rockport, ME, USA.
Sarah J SinclairNorthern Light Cancer Institute, Brewer, ME, USA.
Philip L BrooksNorthern Light Cancer Institute, Brewer, ME, USA.
Christian A ThomasNew England Cancer Specialists, Scarborough, ME, USA.
Karen RasmussenSpectrum Healthcare, South Portland, ME, USA.
Paul K J HanCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, USA.
Edison T LiuThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Jens RueterThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME, USA. jens.rueter@jax.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-025X
Jackson Laboratory · USMaineHealth · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USNew England Cancer Specialists · USPen Bay Medical Center · USSpectrum Health · USTufts University · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Mark D ADAMS · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
CTSA Institutional Mentored Career Development Program (KL2)KL2TR002545 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI FREUND, KAREN · 2018 to 2022
$5.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002545NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic tumor testing (GTT) is an emerging technology aimed at identifying variants in tumors that can be targeted with genomically matched drugs. Due to limited resources, rural patients receiving care in community oncology settings may be less likely to benefit from GTT. We analyzed GTT results and observational clinical outcomes data from patients enrolled in the Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative (MCGI), which provided access to GTTs; clinician educational resources; and genomic tumor boards in community practices in a predominantly rural state. 1603 adult cancer patients completed enrollment; 1258 had at least one potentially actionable variant identified. 206 (16.4%) patients received a total of 240 genome matched treatments, of those treatments, 64% were FDA-approved in the tumor type, 27% FDA-approved in a different tumor type and 9% were given on a clinical trial. Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting to adjust for baseline characteristics, a Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that patients who received genome matched treatment were 31% less likely to die within 1 year compared to those who did not receive genome matched treatment (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.90; p-value: 0.006). Overall, GTT through this initiative resulted in levels of genome matched treatment that were similar to other initiatives, however, clinical trials represented a smaller share of treatments than previously reported, and "off-label" treatments represented a greater share. Although this was an observational study, we found evidence for a potential 1-year survival benefit for patients who received genome matched treatments. These findings suggest that when disseminated and implemented with a supportive infrastructure, GTT may benefit cancer patients in rural community oncology settings, with further work remaining on providing genome-matched clinical trials.

Identifiers

PMID38461318
PMCPMC10924947
OpenAlexW4392619542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.