Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461316›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Dynamic identification of important nodes in complex networks based on the KPDN-INCC method.

Jieyong Zhang, Liang Zhao, Peng Sun, Wei Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jieyong ZhangInformation and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, 710077, China.
Liang ZhaoNo. 96872 Troops of PLA, Baoji, 721000, China.
Peng SunInformation and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, 710077, China. adam_snowboarder@outlook.com.
Wei LiangInformation and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, 710077, China.

Funding

Shaanxi National Natural Science Foundation 2023-JC-QN-0728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article focuses on the cascading failure problem and node importance evaluation method in complex networks. To address the issue of identifying important nodes in dynamic networks, the method used in static networks is introduced and the necessity of re-evaluating node status during node removal is proposed. Studies have found that the methods for identifying dynamic and static network nodes are two different directions, and most literature only uses dynamic methods to verify static methods. Therefore, it is necessary to find suitable node evaluation methods for dynamic networks. Based on this, this article proposes a method that integrates local and global correlation properties. In terms of global features, we introduce an improved k-shell method with fusion degree to improve the resolution of node ranking. In terms of local features, we introduce Solton factor and structure hole factor improved by INCC (improved network constraint coefficient), which effectively improves the algorithm's ability to identify the relationship between adjacent nodes. Through comparison with existing methods, it is found that the KPDN-INCC method proposed in this paper complements the KPDN method and can accurately identify important nodes, thereby helping to quickly disintegrate the network. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method in identifying important nodes in a small-world network with a random parameter less than 0.4 was verified through artificial network experiments.

Indexed as

Complex networksDynamic attackINCCKPDNNode importance

Identifiers

PMID38461316
PMCPMC10924965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.