Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461236›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Genomic dissection of the correlation between milk yield and various health traits using functional and evolutionary information about imputed sequence variants of 34,497 German Holstein cows.

Helen Schneider, Ana-Marija Krizanac, Clemens Falker-Gieske, Johannes Heise, Jens Tetens, Georg Thaller, Jörn Bennewitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helen SchneiderInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany. helen.schneider@uni-hohenheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-5937
Ana-Marija KrizanacDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-8031
Clemens Falker-GieskeDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-1909
Johannes HeiseVereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V. (VIT), 27283, Verden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-7148
Jens TetensDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-464X
Georg ThallerInstitute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, 24098, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-2039
Jörn BennewitzInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6450-1160
University of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BE3703/15-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TE622/6-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decades, it was subject of many studies to investigate the genomic connection of milk production and health traits in dairy cattle. Thereby, incorporating functional information in genomic analyses has been shown to improve the understanding of biological and molecular mechanisms shaping complex traits and the accuracies of genomic prediction, especially in small populations and across-breed settings. Still, little is known about the contribution of different functional and evolutionary genome partitioning subsets to milk production and dairy health. Thus, we performed a uni- and a bivariate analysis of milk yield (MY) and eight health traits using a set of ~34,497 German Holstein cows with 50K chip genotypes and ~17 million imputed sequence variants divided into 27 subsets depending on their functional and evolutionary annotation. In the bivariate analysis, eight trait-combinations were observed that contrasted MY with each health trait. Two genomic relationship matrices (GRM) were included, one consisting of the 50K chip variants and one consisting of each set of subset variants, to obtain subset heritabilities and genetic correlations. In addition, 50K chip heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated applying merely the 50K GRM.

resultsIn general, 50K chip heritabilities were larger than the subset heritabilities. The largest heritabilities were found for MY, which was 0.4358 for the 50K and 0.2757 for the subset heritabilities. Whereas all 50K genetic correlations were negative, subset genetic correlations were both, positive and negative (ranging from -0.9324 between MY and mastitis to 0.6662 between MY and digital dermatitis). The subsets containing variants which were annotated as noncoding related, splice sites, untranslated regions, metabolic quantitative trait loci, and young variants ranked highest in terms of their contribution to the traits` genetic variance. We were able to show that linkage disequilibrium between subset variants and adjacent variants did not cause these subsets` high effect.

conclusionOur results confirm the connection of milk production and health traits in dairy cattle via the animals` metabolic state. In addition, they highlight the potential of including functional information in genomic analyses, which helps to dissect the extent and direction of the observed traits` connection in more detail.

Indexed as

MilkPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsCattleFemaleGenomicsGenotypeLactationPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociDairy cattleFunctional informationGenome annotationGenomic predictionHealth traitsImputed whole genome sequence variantsMilk production

Identifiers

PMID38461236
PMCPMC11385139
OpenAlexW4392615508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.