Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461235›Full record

SynthesisBMC women's health2024

Association of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maryam Salimi, Monireh Khanzadeh, Seyed Ali Nabipoorashrafi, Seyed Arsalan Seyedi, Shirin Yaghoobpoor, Jean-Michel Brismée, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Mehrnoosh Ebadi, Arshin Ghaedi, Varun Singh Kumar and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maryam SalimiBone and Joint Diseases Research Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Monireh KhanzadehGeriatric & Gerontology Department, Medical School, Tehran University of medical and health sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ali NabipoorashrafiEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center (EMRC), School of Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Arsalan SeyediEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center (EMRC), School of Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Shirin YaghoobpoorStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jean-Michel BrisméeCenter for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Brandon Lucke-WoldDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Mehrnoosh EbadiFaculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Arshin GhaediStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Varun Singh KumarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Peyman MirghaderiStudents' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid RabieDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shokoufeh KhanzadehTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Khshokufe7@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels between women with post-menopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis to those with normal bone mineral density (BMD).

methodsWe used Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to conduct a systematic search for relevant publications published before June 19, 2022, only in English language. We reported standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Because a significant level of heterogeneity was found, we used the random-effects model to calculate pooled effects. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment.

resultsOverall, eight articles were included in the analysis. Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis had elevated levels of NLR compared to those without osteoporosis (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.88, p = 0.017, I

conclusionThe results of this study point to NLR as a potential biomarker that may be easily introduced into clinical settings to help predict and prevent post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, MetabolicOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone DensityFemaleHumansLymphocytesNeutrophilsPostmenopauseMeta-analysisNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioNLRPost-menopausal osteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38461235
PMCPMC10924380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.