ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
Denoising parameter dependence of coronary artery depictability in compressed sensing magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using numerical indices and visual evaluation, we evaluated the dependence of coronary-artery depictability on the denoising parameter in compressed sensing magnetic resonance angiography (CS-MRA). This study was conducted to clarify the acceleration factor (AF) and denoising factor (DF) dependence of CS-MRA image quality. Vascular phantoms and clinical images were acquired using three-dimensional CS-MRA on a clinical 1.5 T system. For the phantom measurements, we compared the full width at half maximum (FWHM), sharpness, and contrast ratio of the vascular profile curves for various AFs and DFs. In the clinical cases, the FWHM, sharpness, contrast ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, noise level values, and visual evaluation results were compared for various DFs. Phantom image analyses demonstrated that the respective measurements of the FWHM, sharpness, and contrast ratios did not significantly change with an increase in AF. The FWHM and sharpness measurements slightly changed with the DF level. However, the contrast ratio tended to increase with an increase in the DF level. In the clinical cases, the FWHM and sharpness showed no significant differences, even when the DF level was changed. However, the contrast ratio tended to decrease as the DF level increased. When the DF levels of the clinical cases increased, the background signals of the myocardium, fat, and noise levels decreased. We investigated the dependence of the coronary-artery depictability on AF and DF using CS-MRA. Analysis of the coronary-artery profile curves indicated that a better image quality was achieved with a stronger DF on coronary CS-MRA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38461220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.