Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461179›Full record

ArticleCell death discovery2024

Uric acid-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggers lens epithelial cell senescence and cataract formation.

Hong Liang Lin, Sheng Wang, Kota Sato, Yu Qiao Zhang, Bei Ting He, Jing Xu, Toru Nakazawa, Yong Jie Qin, Hong Yang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Correlation between hyperuricemia and coronary artery calcification.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Review
  7. Loss of Peroxiredoxin 6 Drives Age-Related Klf9/NF-Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hong Liang Lin *Department of Ophthalmology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-7279
Sheng Wang *Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-2436
Kota SatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-5545
Yu Qiao ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bei Ting HeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Toru NakazawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yong Jie QinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. qyjie@link.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-0865
Hong Yang ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. hy3005716@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-8327
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNTohoku University · JPChinese University of Hong Kong · HKNanfang Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82171036Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2023A1515011735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive uric acid (UA) is associated with age-related cataract. A previous study showed that a high UA level in the aqueous humor stimulated the senescence of lens epithelial cells (LECs), leading to cataract progression. To better understand the underlying mechanisms, we investigated UA-driven senescence in human lens tissue samples obtained during surgery, rat lens organ cultures, and in vivo experiments, using senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) staining, electronic microscopy, Western blotting, and histological analyses. Initially, we identified markedly higher expressions of NLRP3 and caspase-1 in the lens capsules of hyper-uricemic patients compared to normo-uricemic patients. This increase was accompanied by a significant rise in the SA-β-gal positive rate. We next built a cataract model in which rat lenses in an organ culture system were treated with an increasing dosage of UA. Notably, opacification was apparent in the lenses treated with 800 μM of UA starting on the fifth day. Mechanistically, UA treatment not only significantly induced the expression of NLRP3, caspase-1, and IL-1β, but also upregulated the levels of SA-β-gal and the senescence regulators p53 and p21. These effects were fully reversed, and lens opacification was ameliorated by the addition of MCC950, a selective NLRP3 antagonist. Moreover, an in vivo model showed that intravitreal UA injection rapidly induced cataract phenotypes within 21 days, an effect significantly mitigated by co-injection with MCC950. Together, our findings suggest that targeting the UA-induced NLRP3 inflammasome with MCC950 could be a promising strategy for preventing cataract formation associated with inflammageing.

Identifiers

PMID38461179
PMCPMC10925029
OpenAlexW4392620997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.