Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38461146›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2024

Physical integrity and bioefficacy of used long-lasting insecticidal nets in Makenene, Centre Region of Cameroon.

Joel Djoufounna, Laeticia Takougan-Sonfouet, Roland Bamou, Idriss N Ngangue-Siewe, Paulette N Mbiakop, Borel Djiappi-Tchamen, Raymond Tabue, Dorothy Achu-Fosah, Joel M Ateba, Marie P A Mayi and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joel DjoufounnaVector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit for Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Dschang, PoBox 067 Dschang, Cameroon.
Laeticia Takougan-SonfouetVector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit for Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Dschang, PoBox 067 Dschang, Cameroon.
Roland BamouVector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit for Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Dschang, PoBox 067 Dschang, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-9031-1731
Idriss N Ngangue-SieweInstitut de Recherche de Yaoundé (IRY), Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-9578-6365
Paulette N MbiakopInstitut de Recherche de Yaoundé (IRY), Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Borel Djiappi-TchamenVector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit for Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Dschang, PoBox 067 Dschang, Cameroon.
Raymond TabueNational Malaria Control Program, Ministry of public health, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Dorothy Achu-FosahNational Malaria Control Program, Ministry of public health, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Joel M AtebaNational Malaria Control Program, Ministry of public health, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Marie P A MayiVector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit for Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Dschang, PoBox 067 Dschang, Cameroon.
Parfait Awono-AmbeneInstitut de Recherche de Yaoundé (IRY), Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Christophe Antonio-NkondjioInstitut de Recherche de Yaoundé (IRY), Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Timoléon TchuinkamVector Borne Diseases Laboratory of the Research Unit for Biology and Applied Ecology (VBID-RUBAE), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Dschang, PoBox 067 Dschang, Cameroon.
Université de Dschang · CMOrganisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale · CMMinistry of Public Health · CMUniversità di Camerino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) are the recommended tools against mosquito-borne diseases. However, their physical integrity and bioefficacy in the field could be affected by several factors. This study evaluated the physical integrity and bioefficacy of nets used in Makenene since 2016. Cross-sectional field surveys were carried out after 6 y. A questionnaire was first administered to the heads of households, and then the physical integrity of the LLINs was determined by calculating the proportional hole index (pHI). WHO cone bioassays were conducted to determine the bioefficacy of LLINs currently being used against wild strains of Anopheles gambiae s.l., Culex pipiens s.l., and laboratory-reared pyrethroid-susceptible strain of Anopheles coluzzii (Ngousso). Of the 167 LLINs examined in households, 39.5% were fairly good, 26.4% were acceptable, and 34.1% were damaged. The most torn faces of the nets were the sides used for entering and exiting. None of the 30 LLINs used for WHO cone bioassays was still effective against An. gambiae s.l. and Cx. pipiens s.l. while up to 85.7% of these LLINs were at least effective against the susceptible strain after 24 h, with a significant difference observed when comparing the mortality rates between wild and laboratory-susceptible strain of Anopheles (P-value < 0.01). Anopheles gambiae s.l. were all (100%) identified as An. gambiae s.s. by PCR. The LLINs distributed in Makenene since the 2016 campaign are only effective on susceptible strain and should be replaced for a better control of residual malaria transmission and the nuisance by Culex mosquitoes in the locality.

Indexed as

AnophelesCulexInsecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito ControlAnimalsCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesInsecticidesMalariaMosquito VectorsInsecticidesbioefficacylong-lasting insecticide netMakenenephysical integrity

Identifiers

PMID38461146
PMCPMC11491827
OpenAlexW4392634028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.