Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38460027›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Reaction norm for genomic prediction of plant growth: modeling drought stress response in soybean.

Yusuke Toda, Goshi Sasaki, Yoshihiro Ohmori, Yuji Yamasaki, Hirokazu Takahashi, Hideki Takanashi, Mai Tsuda, Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae, Hisashi Tsujimoto, Akito Kaga and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke TodaGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Goshi SasakiGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro OhmoriGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji YamasakiGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TakahashiGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideki TakanashiGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mai TsudaTsukuba-Plant Innovation Research Center (T-PIRC), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiromi Kajiya-KanegaeResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology, NARO, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisashi TsujimotoArid Land Research Center, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Akito KagaInstitute of Crop Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masami HiraiRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Tsukuba, Japan.
Mikio NakazonoGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Toru FujiwaraGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyoshi IwataGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. hiroiwata@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-7036
The University of Tokyo · JPNagoya University · JPTottori University · JPInstitute of Crop Science · JPResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology · JPRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR16O2Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22H02306JST-Mirai Program JPMJMI20C7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe proposed models to predict the effects of genomic and environmental factors on daily soybean growth and applied them to soybean growth data obtained with unmanned aerial vehicles. Advances in high-throughput phenotyping technology have made it possible to obtain time-series plant growth data in field trials, enabling genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E) modeling of plant growth. Although the reaction norm is an effective method for quantitatively evaluating G × E and has been implemented in genomic prediction models, no reaction norm models have been applied to plant growth data. Here, we propose a novel reaction norm model for plant growth using spline and random forest models, in which daily growth is explained by environmental factors one day prior. The proposed model was applied to soybean canopy area and height to evaluate the influence of drought stress levels. Changes in the canopy area and height of 198 cultivars were measured by remote sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles. Multiple drought stress levels were set as treatments, and their time-series soil moisture was measured. The models were evaluated using three cross-validation schemes. Although accuracy of the proposed models did not surpass that of single-trait genomic prediction, the results suggest that our model can capture G × E, especially the latter growth period for the random forest model. Also, significant variations in the G × E of the canopy height during the early growth period were visualized using the spline model. This result indicates the effectiveness of the proposed models on plant growth data and the possibility of revealing G × E in various growth stages in plant breeding by applying statistical or machine learning models to time-series phenotype data.

Indexed as

DroughtsGlycine maxGenomeGenomicsPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID38460027
PMCPMC10924738
OpenAlexW4392619945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.