Observational studyEuropean radiology2024
Prospective validation of the role of PET/CT in detecting disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.
Observational study in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Complete Metabolic Response on Post-Neoadjuvant 18F-FDG PET/CT with Complete Cytoreduction in Advanced High-Grade Serous Tubo-Ovarian Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Value of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for the prediction of surgical and clinical outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Perspectives of positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-fluorine-18-flu-d-glucose (18fdg-pet) in predicting the histological response of high grade epithelial ovarian cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A primary descriptive study.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of 2-[ MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study consisted historical observational cohort and prospective validation cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV OC scheduled for NACT were recruited, with imaging performed after three to six cycles of NACT before interval debulking surgery. Nineteen regions in the abdominopelvic cavity were scored for the presence and absence of disease, referenced to the intra-operative findings or histological specimens. Diagnostic metrics were compared using McNemar's test.
resultsIn the historical cohort (23 patients, age 58 ± 13), 2-[
conclusion2-[ CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: 2-[ KEY POINTS: • Additional value of 2-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.