Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38460001›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2024

Future in the past: paternal reprogramming of offspring phenotype and the epigenetic mechanisms.

Di Wu, Kejia Zhang, Kaifeng Guan, Faheem Ahmed Khan, Nuruliarizki Shinta Pandupuspitasari, Windu Negara, Fei Sun, Chunjie Huang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The silent threat: PMArchives of toxicology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Di Wu *Institute of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Kejia Zhang *Institute of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Kaifeng Guan *School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Faheem Ahmed KhanResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta Pusat, 10340, Indonesia.
Nuruliarizki Shinta PandupuspitasariFaculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 1269, Indonesia.
Windu NegaraResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta Pusat, 10340, Indonesia.
Fei SunInstitute of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China. sunfei@ntu.edu.cn.
Chunjie HuangInstitute of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China. goodlife.huang@ntu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-6325

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region 2021BEG02029Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province 2023C03035National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2700200National Natural Science Foundation of China 82371613Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province 22KJB180006Scientific Research Funds of Nantong University Medical School TDYX2022005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

That certain preconceptual paternal exposures reprogram the developmental phenotypic plasticity in future generation(s) has conceptualized the "paternal programming of offspring health" hypothesis. This transgenerational effect is transmitted primarily through sperm epigenetic mechanisms-DNA methylation, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and associated RNA modifications, and histone modifications-and potentially through non-sperm-specific mechanisms-seminal plasma and circulating factors-that create 'imprinted' memory of ancestral information. The epigenetic landscape in sperm is highly responsive to environmental cues, due to, in part, the soma-to-germline communication mediated by epididymosomes. While human epidemiological studies and experimental animal studies have provided solid evidences in support of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, how ancestral information is memorized as epigenetic codes for germline transmission is poorly understood. Particular elusive is what the downstream effector pathways that decode those epigenetic codes into persistent phenotypes. In this review, we discuss the paternal reprogramming of offspring phenotype and the possible underlying epigenetic mechanisms. Cracking these epigenetic mechanisms will lead to a better appreciation of "Paternal Origins of Health and Disease" and guide innovation of intervention algorithms to achieve 'healthier' outcomes in future generations. All this will revolutionize our understanding of human disease etiology.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticPhenotypeAnimalsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMalePaternal ExposurePaternal InheritanceRNA, UntranslatedSpermatozoaRNA, UntranslatedEtiology of human diseasePaternal Origins of Health and DiseasePaternal programming of offspring healthSperm epigenetic mechanismsTransgenerational epigenetic inheritance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.