Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459975›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

Physical function trajectory after wrist or lower arm fracture in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative Study.

Carolyn J Crandall, Joseph Larson, Aladdin H Shadyab, Meryl S LeBoff, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Julie C Weitlauf, Nazmus Saquib, Jane A Cauley, Juliann Saquib, Kristine E Ensrud

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New Challenges: Use and Interpretation of Radius Bone Mineral Density.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn J CrandallDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, 1100 Glendon Ave. Suite 850 - Room 858, Los Angeles, 90024, USA. ccrandall@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9441-0198
Joseph LarsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
Aladdin H ShadyabHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Meryl S LeBoffEndocrine, Diabetes and Hypertension Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jean Wactawski-WendeDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Julie C WeitlaufVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Nazmus SaquibDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman AlRajhi University, PO Box 777, Bukariyah, AlQassim, Saudi Arabia.
Jane A CauleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Juliann SaquibDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman AlRajhi University, PO Box 777, Bukariyah, AlQassim, Saudi Arabia.
Kristine E EnsrudDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges · SABrigham and Women's Hospital · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE - CLINICAL COORDINATING CENTER: TASK AREA B - LONG LIFE STUDY VISIT 2 LIMITED HOME VISIT75N92021D00001 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GARNET L. · 2021 to 2025
$52.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92021D00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term physical functioning trajectories following distal forearm fracture are unknown. We found that women with versus those without distal forearm fracture were more likely to experience a 5-year decline in physical functioning, independent of initial physical functioning level. This association was most evident among women 80 years and older.

introductionPhysical functioning trajectory following lower arm or wrist fracture is not well understood. PURPOSE: This study is to evaluate physical functioning trajectory before vs. after lower arm or wrist fracture, stratified by age.

methodsWe performed a nested case-control study of prospective data from the Women's Health Initiative Study (n = 2097 cases with lower arm or wrist fracture, 20,970 controls). Self-reported fractures and the physical functioning subscale of the RAND 36-item Short-Form Health Survey were assessed annually. We examined three physical functioning trajectory groups: stable, improving, and declining.

resultsMean (SD) number of physical functioning measurements was 5.2 (1.5) for cases and 5.0 (1.4) for controls. Declining physical functioning was observed among 20.4% of cases and 16.0% of controls. Compared to women without lower arm or wrist fracture, women with lower arm or wrist fracture were 33% more likely to experience declining physical functioning (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.49, reference group stable or improving physical functioning trajectory). Associations varied by age: age ≥ 80 years aOR 1.56 (95% CI 1.29-1.88); age 70-79 years aOR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09-1.52); age < 70 years aOR 1.15 (95% CI 0.86-1.53) (p

conclusionsWomen with lower arm or wrist fracture, particularly those aged 80 and older, were more likely to experience declines in physical functioning than women without such fractures, independent of baseline physical functioning level.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesWrist InjuriesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPostmenopauseProspective StudiesRadius FracturesUnited StatesForearm fractureOsteoporosisPhysical functionWrist fracture

Identifiers

PMID38459975
PMCPMC11136816
OpenAlexW4392619268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.