Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459703›Full record

ArticlePublic understanding of science (Bristol, England)2024

Stereotypes and social evaluations of scientists are related to different antecedents and outcomes.

Vukašin Gligorić, Roy Clerc, Gabi Arkensteijn, Gerben A van Kleef, Bastiaan T Rutjens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vukašin GligorićUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7528-6806
Roy ClercUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gabi ArkensteijnUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerben A van KleefUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan T RutjensUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-4156
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on scientist perceptions tends to focus on either stereotypes (white, male) or social evaluations (competent but cold), sometimes yielding incongruent conclusions (e.g. scientists are simultaneously seen as moral and immoral). Across two preregistered correlational studies (

Indexed as

ScienceStereotypingAdultFemaleHumansMalePoliticsSocial PerceptionTrustscientist evaluationsscientist perceptionsscientists-attitudesstereotypes of scientiststrust in scientists

Identifiers

PMID38459703
PMCPMC11459872
OpenAlexW4392623530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.