Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459699›Full record

SynthesisJournal of biological rhythms2024

Circadian Variation in the Response to Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Evidence Appraisal.

Cathy A Wyse, Laura M Rudderham, Enya A Nordon, Louise M Ince, Andrew N Coogan, Lorna M Lopez

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of biological rhythms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cathy A WyseKathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research and Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1673-647X
Laura M RudderhamKathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research and Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Enya A NordonKathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research and Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Louise M InceDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Andrew N CooganKathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research and Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Lorna M LopezKathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research and Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
National University of Ireland, Maynooth · IEThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular timing mechanisms known as circadian clocks drive endogenous 24-h rhythmicity in most physiological functions, including innate and adaptive immunity. Consequently, the response to immune challenge such as vaccination might depend on the time of day of exposure. This study assessed whether the time of day of vaccination (TODV) is associated with the subsequent immune and clinical response by conducting a systematic review of previous studies. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google, Medline, and Embase were searched for studies that reported TODV and immune and clinical outcomes, yielding 3114 studies, 23 of which met the inclusion criteria. The global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination program facilitated investigation of TODV and almost half of the studies included reported data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was considerable heterogeneity in the demography of participants and type of vaccine, and most studies were biased by failure to account for immune status prior to vaccination, self-selection of vaccination time, or confounding factors such as sleep, chronotype, and shiftwork. The optimum TODV was concluded to be afternoon (5 studies), morning (5 studies), morning and afternoon (1 study), midday (1 study), and morning or late afternoon (1 study), with the remaining 10 studies reporting no effect. Further research is required to understand the relationship between TODV and subsequent immune outcome and whether any clinical benefit outweighs the potential effect of this intervention on vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCircadian ClocksHumansTime FactorsCOVID-19 Vaccinesadaptive immunitycircadiantime of dayvaccine

Identifiers

PMID38459699
PMCPMC11141079
OpenAlexW4392620869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.