Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459543›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2024

Phenotypic, molecular detection, and Antibiotic Resistance Profile (MDR and XDR) of Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from Farmed Tilapia zillii and Mugil cephalus.

Hala F Ayoub, Ahmed R Khafagy, Aboelkair M Esawy, Noura Abo El-Moaty, Khairiah Mubarak Alwutayd, Abdallah Tageldein Mansour, Reham A Ibrahim, Dalia A Abdel-Moneam, Reham M El-Tarabili

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multidrug-resistantVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hala F AyoubDepartment of Fish Health and Management, Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (CLAR), Agricultural Research Center, Abo-Hammad, Sharqia, Abbassa, 44662, Egypt. DrHalaclar16@gmail.com.
Ahmed R KhafagyDepartment of Bacteriology, Immunology, and Mycology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Aboelkair M EsawyDepartment of Microbiology, Animal Health Research Institute, Mansoura branch, Mansoura, Egypt.
Noura Abo El-MoatyDepartment of Microbiology, Animal Health Research Institute, Mansoura branch, Mansoura, Egypt.
Khairiah Mubarak AlwutaydDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Abdallah Tageldein MansourFish and Animal Production and Aquaculture Department, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia. amansour@kfu.edu.sa.
Reham A IbrahimMicrobiology Department, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Cairo, Egypt.
Dalia A Abdel-MoneamDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, 12211, Egypt.
Reham M El-TarabiliDepartment of Bacteriology, Immunology and Mycology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EGCairo University · EGNational Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries · EGPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SASuez Canal University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, Aeromonas hydrophila was isolated from Tilapia zillii and Mugil cephalus samples collected during different seasons from various Suez Canal areas in Egypt. The prevalence of A. hydrophila, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance profile of the isolates to the commonly used antibiotics in aquaculture were investigated to identify multiple drug resistance (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) strains. In addition, a pathogenicity test was conducted using A. hydrophila, which was isolated and selected based on the prevalence of virulence and resistance genes, and morbidity of natural infected fish. The results revealed that A. hydrophila was isolated from 38 of the 120 collected fish samples (31.6%) and confirmed phenotypically and biochemically. Several virulence genes were detected in retrieved A. hydrophila isolates, including aerolysin aerA (57.9%), ser (28.9%), alt (26.3%), ast (13.1%), act (7.9%), hlyA (7.9%), and nuc (18.4%). Detection of antibiotic-resistant genes revealed that all isolates were positive for bla

Indexed as

Aeromonas hydrophilaTilapiaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialDrug Resistance, MultipleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAeromonas hydrophilaAntibiotic resistance, cultured freshwater fishPrevalenceVirulence genes

Identifiers

PMID38459543
PMCPMC10921648
OpenAlexW4392591248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.