ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Bayesian inference for identifying tumour-specific cancer dependencies through integration of ex-vivo drug response assays and drug-protein profiling.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GPerturb: Gaussian process modelling of single-cell perturbation data.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of tumor-specific molecular dependencies is essential for the development of effective cancer therapies. Genetic and chemical perturbations are powerful tools for discovering these dependencies. Even though chemical perturbations can be applied to primary cancer samples at large scale, the interpretation of experiment outcomes is often complicated by the fact that one chemical compound can affect multiple proteins. To overcome this challenge, Batzilla et al. (PLoS Comput Biol 18(8): e1010438, 2022) proposed DepInfeR, a regularized multi-response regression model designed to identify and estimate specific molecular dependencies of individual cancers from their ex-vivo drug sensitivity profiles. Inspired by their work, we propose a Bayesian extension to DepInfeR. Our proposed approach offers several advantages over DepInfeR, including e.g. the ability to handle missing values in both protein-drug affinity and drug sensitivity profiles without the need for data pre-processing steps such as imputation. Moreover, our approach uses Gaussian Processes to capture more complex molecular dependency structures, and provides probabilistic statements about whether a protein in the protein-drug affinity profiles is informative to the drug sensitivity profiles. Simulation studies demonstrate that our proposed approach achieves better prediction accuracy, and is able to discover unreported dependency structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.