Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459378›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2024

[Understanding complex processes better-A case study on increasing patient safety and efficiency in a central operating room].

Tillmann Speer, Thomas Mühlbradt, Helga Unger, Christian Fastner, Stefan Schröder

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tillmann SpeerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum Itzehoe, Robert-Koch-Straße 2, 25524, Itzehoe, Deutschland. t.speer@kh-itzehoe.de.
Thomas MühlbradtFOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen, Deutschland.
Helga UngerFOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen, Deutschland.
Christian FastnerI. Medizinische Klinik - Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie, internistische Intensivmedizin und Hämostaseologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim (UMM), Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Stefan SchröderKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Schmerztherapie und Notfallmedizin, Artemed Krankenhaus Düren, Düren, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious professional groups are involved in the daily work of the central operating room with the aim of providing the best possible treatment for each individual using modern medical technology (sociotechnical system) in a cost-effective manner. Ensuring perioperative patient safety is of particular importance. At the same time, the efficient use of the central operating room is essential for the economic success of a hospital. Preoperative preparation is a complex process with many substeps that are often difficult to manage. Historically, the focus has been on retrospective learning from errors and incidents. More recent approaches take a systemic view. A central idea is to consider the mostly positive course of treatment and the adjustments to daily work that are currently required by the people involved (Safety-II). By taking greater account of how the many components of the system interact, processes can be better understood and specific measures derived. This strengthens the system's ability to adapt to changes and disturbances, thus ensuring that goals are achieved. The functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) is an internationally recognized method for modelling work as done compared to work as imagined. This paper presents the application of FRAM to preoperative preparation in a major regional hospital.

objectiveIs FRAM suitable for improving process understanding in preoperative preparation? MATERIAL AND

methodsAn interdisciplinary project team identified relevant functions of preoperative preparation through document analysis and walkthroughs. Based on this, more than 30 guided interviews were conducted with functionaries. The results were presented graphically and specific information, such as safety-related statements or reasons for the variability of functions, were also presented textually. In the next phase, statements were evaluated and compared with the target model and the job descriptions.

resultsThe FRAM revealed the process as a complex network of relationships. During the modelling process, a varying degree of centrality and variability of certain functions became apparent. From the observations, the project team selected those with high relevance for patient safety and for the efficiency of the overall process in order to prioritize starting points for deriving measures to increase resilience. These starting points relate either to single functions, such as surgical site marking or to multiple functions that are variable in their execution, such as delays due to nonsynchronized duty times.

conclusionThe FRAM conducted provides valuable new insights into the functioning of complex sociotechnical systems that go far beyond classical linear methods. The awareness of operational processes gained and the resulting dynamic view of interactions within the system enable specific measures to be derived that promote resilient behavior and reduce critical variability, thus contributing to increased patient safety and efficiency.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsPatient SafetyEfficiencyHospitalsHumansRetrospective StudiesOperating room managementPreoperative preparationProcess understandingSociotechnical systemsSystem analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.