Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459368›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.

Theunis van Zyl, Anthony M-H Ho, Gregory Klar, Christopher Haley, Adrienne K Ho, Susan Vasily, Glenio B Mizubuti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early treatment goal uncertainty as a barrier to regional analgesia and respiratory deterioration in traumatic rib fractures: a propensity-weighted analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theunis van ZylDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Anthony M-H HoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Gregory KlarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Christopher HaleyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Adrienne K HoDepartment of Public Health Sciences (Epidemiology), School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Susan VasilyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Glenio B MizubutiDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Victory 2 Wing, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada. gleniomizubuti@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5515-829X
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRib fracture(s) is a common and painful injury often associated with significant morbidity (e.g., respiratory complications) and high mortality rates, especially in the elderly. Risk stratification and prompt implementation of analgesic pathways using a multimodal analgesia approach comprise a primary endpoint of care to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with rib fractures. This narrative review aims to describe the most recent evidence and care pathways currently available, including risk stratification tools and pharmacologic and regional analgesic blocks frequently used as part of the broadly recommended multimodal analgesic approach. SOURCE: Available literature was searched using PubMed and Embase databases for each topic addressed herein and reviewed by content experts. PRINCIPAL

findingsFour risk stratification tools were identified, with the Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma score as most predictive. Current evidence on pharmacologic (i.e., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) and regional analgesia (i.e., thoracic epidural analgesia, thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block) techniques was reviewed, as was the pathophysiology of rib fracture(s) and its associated complications, including the development of chronic pain and disabilities.

conclusionRib fracture(s) continues to be a serious diagnosis, with high rates of mortality, development of chronic pain, and disability. A multidisciplinary approach to management, combined with appropriate analgesia and adherence to care bundles/protocols, has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Most of the risk-stratifying care pathways identified perform poorly in predicting mortality and complications after rib fracture(s).

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesia, EpiduralChronic PainRib FracturesAgedAnalgesicsHumansPain ManagementAnalgesicsanalgesiaregional analgesiareviewrib fracturerisk stratificationtrauma

Identifiers

PMID38459368
OpenAlexW4392578573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.