Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459347›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2024

ESR Essentials: Imaging of sacroiliitis-practice recommendations by ESSR.

Elke Vereecke, Torsten Diekhoff, Iris Eshed, Nele Herregods, Lieve Morbée, Jacob L Jaremko, Lennart Jans

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. When it is not sacroiliitis.Skeletal radiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Axial Imaging in Spondyloarthritis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  11. Imaging of Sacroiliac Pain: The Current State-of-the-Art.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elke VereeckeDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Torsten DiekhoffDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Iris EshedDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 5262000, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Nele HerregodsDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Lieve MorbéeDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jacob L JaremkoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Lennart JansDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. lennart.jans@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7909-2643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacroiliitis is commonly seen in patients with axial spondyloarthritis, in whom timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent irreversible structural damage. Imaging has a prominent place in the diagnostic process and several new imaging techniques have been examined for this purpose. We present a summary of updated evidence-based practice recommendations for imaging of sacroiliitis. MRI remains the imaging modality of choice for patients with suspected sacroiliitis, using at least four sequences: coronal oblique T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive sequences, a perpendicular axial oblique sequence, and a sequence for optimal evaluation of the bone-cartilage interface. Both active inflammatory and structural lesions should be described in the report, indicating location and extent. Radiography and CT, especially low-dose CT, are reasonable alternatives when MRI is unavailable, as patients are often young. This is particularly true to evaluate structural lesions, at which CT excels. Dual-energy CT with virtual non-calcium images can be used to depict bone marrow edema. Knowledge of normal imaging features in children (e.g., flaring, blurring, or irregular appearance of the articular surface) is essential for interpreting sacroiliac joint MRI in children because these normal processes can simulate disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Sacroiliitis is a potentially debilitating disease if not diagnosed and treated promptly, before structural damage to the sacroiliac joints occurs. Imaging has a prominent place in the diagnostic process. We present a summary of practice recommendations for imaging of sacroiliitis, including several new imaging techniques. KEY POINTS: • MRI is the modality of choice for suspected inflammatory sacroiliitis, including a joint-line-specific sequence for optimal evaluation of the bone-cartilage interface to improve detection of erosions. • Radiography and CT (especially low-dose CT) are reasonable alternatives when MRI is unavailable. • Knowledge of normal imaging features in children is mandatory for interpretation of MRI of pediatric sacroiliac joints.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliitisTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansSacroiliac JointAxial spondyloarthritisMagnetic resonance imagingSacroiliac jointSacroiliitisTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.