Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459248›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Greater ecophysiological stress tolerance in the core environment than in extreme environments of wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum).

Christopher P Krieg, Duncan D Smith, Mark A Adams, Jens Berger, Niloofar Layegh Nikravesh, Eric J von Wettberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher P KriegUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. christopher.p.krieg@gmail.com.
Duncan D SmithUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-3812
Mark A AdamsSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-0097
Jens BergerCSIRO, Agriculture and Food, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-5099
Niloofar Layegh NikraveshDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Eric J von WettbergDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-0317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global climate change and land use change underlie a need to develop new crop breeding strategies, and crop wild relatives (CWR) have become an important potential source of new genetic material to improve breeding efforts. Many recent approaches assume adaptive trait variation increases towards the relative environmental extremes of a species range, potentially missing valuable trait variation in more moderate or typical climates. Here, we leveraged distinct genotypes of wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum) that differ in their relative climates from moderate to more extreme and perform targeted assessments of drought and heat tolerance. We found significance variation in ecophysiological function and stress tolerance between genotypes but contrary to expectations and current paradigms, it was individuals from more moderate climates that exhibited greater capacity for stress tolerance than individuals from warmer and drier climates. These results indicate that wild germplasm collection efforts to identify adaptive variation should include the full range of environmental conditions and habitats instead of only environmental extremes, and that doing so may significantly enhance the success of breeding programs broadly.

Indexed as

CicerExtreme EnvironmentsGenotypeHumansPhenotypePlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID38459248
PMCPMC10923935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.