ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Point-of-care abdominal ultrasound in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organ size in small infants (The OSSI Study): establishing sonographic reference intervals for abdominal organs in preterm infants.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of renal and urinary tract point-of-care ultrasound in the neonatal intensive care unit: insights from a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Application value of abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pediatric patients aged 3-12 years with acute appendicitis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Utility of point-of-care ultrasound of the liver in the neonatal intensive care unit: experience from a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Editorial: Methods in pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A spectrum of critical abdominal pathological conditions that might occur in neonates and children warrants real-time point-of-care abdominal ultrasound (abdominal POCUS) assessment. Abdominal radiographs have limited value with low sensitivity and specificity in many cases and have no value in assessing abdominal organ perfusion and microcirculation (Rehan et al. in Clin Pediatr (Phila) 38(11):637-643, 1999). The advantages of abdominal POCUS include that it is non-invasive, easily available, can provide information in real-time, and can guide therapeutic intervention (such as paracentesis and urinary bladder catheterization), making it a crucial tool for use in pediatric and neonatal abdominal emergencies (Martínez Biarge et al. in J Perinat Med 32(2):190-194, 2004) and (Alexander et al. in Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 106(1):F96-103, 2021). Conclusion: Abdominal POCUS is a dynamic assessment with many ultrasound markers of gut injury by two dimensions (2-D) and color Doppler (CD) compared to the abdominal X-ray; the current evidence supports the superiority of abdominal POCUS over an abdominal X-ray in emergency situations. However, it should still be considered an adjunct rather than replacing abdominal X-rays due to its limitations and operator constraints (Alexander et al. in Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 106(1):F96-103, 2021). What is Known: • Ultrasound is an important modality for the assessment of abdominal pathologies. What is New: • The evidence supports the superiority of abdominal POCUS over an abdominal X-ray in emergency abdominal situations in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.