ArticleScientific reports2024
Preliminary characterization of rectification for transradial prosthetic sockets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward predictive prosthetic socket modeling: Preliminary linear regression models of transradial limb-socket geometry.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- An Optimization Method for an Active Multi-Unit Prosthetic Socket with Dynamic Adaptability in Multi-Task Scenarios.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Smartphone photogrammetry for prosthetics and orthotics: accuracy and reliability across upper-limb, lower-limb, and AFO casts.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- PACT: A practice-driven predictive algorithm for customized transradial prosthetic socket design.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Evidence-Generated Sockets for Transtibial Prosthetic Limbs Compared With Conventional Computer-Aided Designs: A Multiple-Methods Study From the Patient's Perspective.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Article
- Article
- Insights into the spectrum of transtibial prosthetic socket design from expert clinicians and their digital records.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving proper socket fit is crucial for the effective use of a prosthesis. However, digital socket design lacks standardization and presents a steep learning curve for prosthetists. While research has focused on digital socket design for the lower-limb population, there is a research gap in upper-limb socket design. This study aimed to characterize the design (rectification) process for the transradial socket, specifically the three-quarter Northwestern-style design, towards the development of a more systematic, data-driven socket design approach. Fourteen (n = 14) pairs of unrectified and rectified plaster models were compared. Six common rectification zones were identified through shape analysis, with zones of plaster addition being the most prominent in terms of volume and surface area. A novel 3D vector mapping technique was employed, which revealed that most of the shape changes occurred in the anterior-posterior and proximal-distal directions. Overall, the interquartile range of each rectification zone demonstrated reasonable consistency in terms of volume, surface deviation, and 3D vector representation. The initial findings from this study support the potential for quantitively modelling the transradial socket design process. This opens the door for developing tools for categorizing and predicting socket designs across diverse populations through the application of techniques such as machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.