Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38459096›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhancing parasitic organism detection in microscopy images through deep learning and fine-tuned optimizer.

Yogesh Kumar, Pertik Garg, Manu Raj Moudgil, Rupinder Singh, Marcin Woźniak, Jana Shafi, Muhammad Fazal Ijaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yogesh KumarDepartment of CSE, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Pertik GargDepartment of CSE, Swami Vivekanand Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ramnagar, India.
Manu Raj MoudgilDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Bhai Gurdas Institute of Engineering & Technology, Sangrur, Punjab, India.
Rupinder SinghChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Marcin WoźniakFaculty of Applied Mathematics, Silesian University of Technology, Kaszubska 23, 44100, Gliwice, Poland. marcin.wozniak@polsl.pl.
Jana ShafiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information, College of Engineering in Wadi Al Dawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, 11991, Wadi Al Dawasir, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Fazal IjazSchool of IT and Engineering, Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, 3000, Australia. mfazal@mit.edu.au.

Funding

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2023/R/1445Silesian University of Technology 09/010/RGJ24/0031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic organisms pose a major global health threat, mainly in regions that lack advanced medical facilities. Early and accurate detection of parasitic organisms is vital to saving lives. Deep learning models have uplifted the medical sector by providing promising results in diagnosing, detecting, and classifying diseases. This paper explores the role of deep learning techniques in detecting and classifying various parasitic organisms. The research works on a dataset consisting of 34,298 samples of parasites such as Toxoplasma Gondii, Trypanosome, Plasmodium, Leishmania, Babesia, and Trichomonad along with host cells like red blood cells and white blood cells. These images are initially converted from RGB to grayscale followed by the computation of morphological features such as perimeter, height, area, and width. Later, Otsu thresholding and watershed techniques are applied to differentiate foreground from background and create markers on the images for the identification of regions of interest. Deep transfer learning models such as VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50V2, ResNet152V2, EfficientNetB3, EfficientNetB0, MobileNetV2, Xception, DenseNet169, and a hybrid model, InceptionResNetV2, are employed. The parameters of these models are fine-tuned using three optimizers: SGD, RMSprop, and Adam. Experimental results reveal that when RMSprop is applied, VGG19, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetB0 achieve the highest accuracy of 99.1% with a loss of 0.09. Similarly, using the SGD optimizer, InceptionV3 performs exceptionally well, achieving the highest accuracy of 99.91% with a loss of 0.98. Finally, applying the Adam optimizer, InceptionResNetV2 excels, achieving the highest accuracy of 99.96% with a loss of 0.13, outperforming other optimizers. The findings of this research signify that using deep learning models coupled with image processing methods generates a highly accurate and efficient way to detect and classify parasitic organisms.

Indexed as

BabesiaDeep LearningParasitesToxoplasmaAnimalsMicroscopyAdamDeep learningInceptionResNetV2InceptionV3OptimizersParasitic organismsSegmentationWatershed

Identifiers

PMID38459096
PMCPMC10923792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.