Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38458921›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2024

Accuracy in reporting incontinence in adults with spina bifida: A pilot study.

Konrad M Szymanski, Rosalia Misseri, Devon J Hensel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konrad M SzymanskiDivision of Pediatric Urology, Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: szymanko@iupui.edu.
Rosalia MisseriDivision of Pediatric Urology, Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Devon J HenselDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Sociology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Relational and contextual phenomenology of STI/HIV riskR01HD053231 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FORTENBERRY, J. DENNIS · 2008 to 2012
$2.9M
Ecological momentary assessment to understand the impact of daily urinary and fecal incontinence on well-being among adults with spina bifidaR21DK121355 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HENSEL, DEVON J., SZYMANSKI, KONRAD · 2019 to 2020
$430k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053231NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK121355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accuracy of self-reported urinary incontinence (UI) and fecal incontinence (FI) among adults with spina bifida (SB) is unknown. We aimed to quantify the accuracy of self-reported recall incontinence in the last 4 weeks using prospective diary data.

methodsAdults with SB were enrolled via patient advocacy groups in a larger 30-day smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study of daily well-being and incontinence. We examined agreement between yes/no questions on exit questionnaires ("In the last 4 weeks, did you leak any urine and get your underwear, pads, pull-ups or disposable underwear wet?") and 30-day diaries. Collected data included a non-validated 4-item UI Negativity scale (UIN: 0-100, 0 = no impact). Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa (>0.60 = substantial). FI was analyzed similarly. Sub-groups were too small for statistical analysis.

resultsMedian age of 88 adults was 35 years old (70% female, 53% shunted, 71% community ambulators). Among 81 adults reporting UI in the last month, 79 (98%) had diary-documented UI (UI agreement), 2 (2%) did not (Summary Table). Among 7 adults reporting no UI in the last month, 5 (71%) did not record UI in their diaries (agreement in no UI), 2 (29%) did. Both adults reporting no UI on exit questionnaires, despite contrary diary data, experienced single UI episodes (negativity: 0 and 6). In contrast, the UI agreement group recorded UI on median 18 days (median negativity: 22). Sensitivity of the recall UI question was 0.98 (specificity 0.71, kappa 0.69). Among 66 adults reporting FI in the last month, 65 (98%) had diary-documented FI (FI agreement), 1 (2%) did not. Among 22 adults reporting no FI in the last month, 17 (77%) did not record FI in their diaries (agreement in no FI), 5 (23%) did. Five adults reporting no FI on exit questionnaires, despite contrary diary data, experienced a median single episode (median negativity: 8). In contrast, the FI agreement group recorded FI on median 5 days (median negativity: 31). Sensitivity of the recall FI question was 0.93 (specificity 0.94, kappa 0.81). Results were unchanged when analyzing the first and last 28 days of data. COMMENT: Sensitivity/specificity of single incontinence questions approach those reported for women with UI but without SB. Diaries may best serve SB adults with bothersome incontinence.

conclusionsSelf-reported incontinence accurately and reliably captures UI and FI among adults with SB. It may minimize less bothersome incontinence, supporting its use in screening for clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceSelf ReportSpinal DysraphismUrinary IncontinenceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultIncontinenceScreeningSpinal dysraphism

Identifiers

PMID38458921
PMCPMC11180589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.