Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38458755›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2024

Survey of service needs to embed genome sequencing for motor neuron disease in neurology in the English National Health Service.

Jade Howard, Hilary L Bekker, Christopher J McDermott, Alisdair McNeill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jade HowardDivision of Neuroscience, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Hilary L BekkerThe University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Christopher J McDermottDivision of Neuroscience, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alisdair McNeillDivision of Neuroscience, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK a.mcneill@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-3631
University of Sheffield · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All people with motor neuron disease (pwMND) in England are eligible for genome sequencing (GS), with panel-based testing. With the advent of genetically targeted MND treatments, and increasing demand for GS, it is important that clinicians have the knowledge and skills to support pwMND in making informed decisions around GS. We undertook an online survey of clinical genomic knowledge and genetic counselling skills in English clinicians who see pwMND. There were 245 respondents to the survey (160 neurology clinicians and 85 genetic clinicians). Neurology clinicians reported multiple, overlapping barriers to offering pwMND GS. Lack of time to discuss GS in clinic and lack of training in genetics were reported. Neurology clinicians scored significantly less well on self-rated genomic knowledge and genetic counselling skills than genetic clinicians. The majority of neurology clinicians reported that they do not have adequate educational or patient information resources to support GS discussions. We identify low levels of genomic knowledge and skills in the neurology workforce. This may impede access to GS and precision medicine for pwMND.

Indexed as

Motor Neuron DiseaseEnglandFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingGenomicsHumansMaleNeurologyState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesWhole Genome SequencingGenetics, MedicalMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurology

Identifiers

PMID38458755
PMCPMC11228195
OpenAlexW4392616467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.