Equivalent uniform aerobic dose in radiotherapy for hypoxic tumors.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Hypoxia-Targeting Strategies in Radiotherapy and Nitroimidazole-Based Radiosensitizers: A Narrative Review and Translational Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
   Review
2. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Hypoxia PET in Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026
   Review
3. Radiobiological Modeling with Monte Carlo Tools - Simulating Cellular Responses to Ionizing Radiation.Technology in cancer research & treatment
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as