Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38457644›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Phylogenomic position of eupelagonemids, abundant, and diverse deep-ocean heterotrophs.

Gordon Lax, Noriko Okamoto, Patrick J Keeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Isolation and Cultivation of Diplonemids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gordon LaxDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Noriko OkamotoDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Patrick J KeelingDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Funding

Gordon and Betty Moore FoundationHakai InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2014-03994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eupelagonemids, formerly known as Deep Sea Pelagic Diplonemids I (DSPD I), are among the most abundant and diverse heterotrophic protists in the deep ocean, but little else is known about their ecology, evolution, or biology in general. Originally recognized solely as a large clade of environmental ribosomal subunit RNA gene sequences (SSU rRNA), branching with a smaller sister group DSPD II, they were postulated to be diplonemids, a poorly studied branch of Euglenozoa. Although new diplonemids have been cultivated and studied in depth in recent years, the lack of cultured eupelagonemids has limited data to a handful of light micrographs, partial SSU rRNA gene sequences, a small number of genes from single amplified genomes, and only a single formal described species, Eupelagonema oceanica. To determine exactly where this clade goes in the tree of eukaryotes and begin to address the overall absence of biological information about this apparently ecologically important group, we conducted single-cell transcriptomics from two eupelagonemid cells. A SSU rRNA gene phylogeny shows that these two cells represent distinct subclades within eupelagonemids, each different from E. oceanica. Phylogenomic analysis based on a 125-gene matrix contrasts with the findings based on ecological survey data and shows eupelagonemids branch sister to the diplonemid subgroup Hemistasiidae.

Indexed as

EuglenozoaEukaryotaOceans and SeasPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomalflagellatemultigenepelagicphylogeneticsprotist

Identifiers

PMID38457644
PMCPMC10987973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.