Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38457460›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Using early detection data to estimate the date of emergence of an epidemic outbreak.

Sofía Jijón, Peter Czuppon, François Blanquart, Florence Débarre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofía JijónInstitute of ecology and environmental sciences of Paris (iEES-Paris, UMR 7618), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UPEC, IRD, INRAE, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1292-0512
Peter CzupponInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
François BlanquartCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS, Collège de France, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Florence DébarreInstitute of ecology and environmental sciences of Paris (iEES-Paris, UMR 7618), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UPEC, IRD, INRAE, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-833X

Funding

National Institute of Mathematical Sciences and their Interactions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the first infection of an emerging disease is often unknown, information on early cases can be used to date it. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, previous studies have estimated dates of emergence (e.g., first human SARS-CoV-2 infection, emergence of the Alpha SARS-CoV-2 variant) using mainly genomic data. Another dating attempt used a stochastic population dynamics approach and the date of the first reported case. Here, we extend this approach to use a larger set of early reported cases to estimate the delay from first infection to the Nth case. We first validate our framework by running our model on simulated data. We then apply our model using data on Alpha variant infections in the UK, dating the first Alpha infection at (median) August 21, 2020 (95% interpercentile range across retained simulations (IPR): July 23-September 5, 2020). Next, we apply our model to data on COVID-19 cases with symptom onset before mid-January 2020. We date the first SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan at (median) November 28, 2019 (95% IPR: November 2-December 9, 2019). Our results fall within ranges previously estimated by studies relying on genomic data. Our population dynamics-based modelling framework is generic and flexible, and thus can be applied to estimate the starting time of outbreaks in contexts other than COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDisease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38457460
PMCPMC10954163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.